Find a Lawyer

SHER BAHADUR KHAN versus HAJI WALI BAT KHAN

Sections 24, 27 and 28 of the Province Border Pre-Prevention Act 1987 (10 of 1984), Article 163 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), S-115 for a pre-emption trial court, a third of the sale price in cash While directing the deposit and offering the bank guarantee for the remaining two thirds, Val Validity's pre-emptor claimed that the trial court should have asked to submit the market value of the land and the matter was decided in Article 63 QQ should have been based on an oath presented in the sense of legal evidence. , 1984, the Court acted in accordance with the provisions of Section 24 of Act X of 1987, directing the deposit of one-third of the sale price in cash and submitting a bank guarantee for the remaining two-thirds. There was a time when the sale price would be. The actual payment of the price mentioned in the sale process or conversion was to be resolved at the time of trial at the time of questioning the value of the land or the value of the land and not in the preliminary phase of SU in Act X 1987, Under the affidavit, the provisions of Article 163, Convention E Martyrs, 1984, were only applicable when the defendant took an oath in support of his claim in respect of the judgment. tax advocates from Toru lawyer