KARACHI PORT TRUST PROGRESSIVE WORKERS\' UNION versus REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Referendum Conduct bargaining agent, to raise technical objection against holding of new referendum and to file constitutional petition against holding referendum without finally resolving technical objection. after the. The respondent authority was set up with a dual responsibility. On the one hand, it was to ensure that once the referendum was claimed, the schedule of fifteen days in section 22, the Industrial Relations Ordinance was observed with confidence and on the other hand the process of scrutinizing the parties' related claims. I've been there all the time. As the respondent authority has already temporarily formed an opinion regarding membership in competing unions, it has finally reached such a decision on the due date and the applicant has to file a referendum on the due date of the respondent authority. The decision should include a constitutional petition. In conclusion because it was the only order of this nature complaining that it had not been approved, the holding of the referendum should have disappeared automatically after the approval of such order or as an alternative. Such a decision should have provided a new reason. The proceedings, if any, to initiate another application, if guaranteed, or to apply for an amendment to the present constitutional petition but nothing of the sort has occurred. The respondent authority had brought record minutes of the joint meeting between the unions, the appellant and the respondent unions, under which the voter list was found in order and that all competitions were acceptable to the unions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer