MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, FAISALABAD versus PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO.4
Section 2 (i) (vi) of the Salary Payment Act 1936 and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article IV) Gratuity Payment Constitution Jurisdiction, based on a letter issued by the Treasury, the use of the employer corporation according to which the Government The government had decided not to allow the grant of grant to the employees of Punjab, refusing to pay the employee, there was no evidence, which was not headed by the employer corporation before the tribunal that the alleged letter was admittedly Was applied to the employees of the Punjab government, the employee came to the Labor Appellate Tribunal. We conclude that the employer corporation is an independent He was the institution and can not be held department of the government and the employer corporation has its own rules and by-laws and if he decided to adopt any rules, guidelines were issued by the government. It needs to be adopted regularly under the law. The Tribunal has thus given no importance to the letter issued by Government Vale. On the basis of the evidence on record, the Tribunal did not interfere in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. This can be done if no legal error is identified.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Ghazi lawyer