Find a Lawyer

SHAH NAWAZ versus CIVIL JUDGE, RAHIMYARKHAN

Civil Procedure Code Order VIII and O VIII, R1 and Section 115 of the CPC's written statement were intended to be filed by the respondent before. , Was allowed to insert a fresh written statement and withdraw the previous written statement. The trial court's order was upheld in the appeal. The question of whether the written statement was filed by the respondent before it was a question of fact and the courts below had found the same in favor of the accused. On the basis of the evidence, the two courts simultaneously found that the first written statement was not entered by the defendant, therefore, allowing it to file a fresh written statement would not mean that it had to be extra / second written. Permission to enter statement Defendant's first written statement will be Second; The question of making changes to the written form was indicated by the following courts not reading any misunderstanding or evidence, and the decisions of the courts below were not subject to any legal weakness, interference below. Was dismissed with contempt of court's judgments. law firms from Tarmatan lawyer