Following a detailed discussion by the trial court, the testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 304, Part II, was concluded that the two witnesses did not confirm the reasons for the trial court's record, Both were based on evidence. The witnesses were closely linked to the deceased and their presence could not be closed at the time of the incident, but there was nothing available on the record that the two suspects could have been present at the scene of the incident where the victim was killed early in the morning. Particularly when it was not the case of the prosecution that the accused, who was neither resident in the area nor used to raise his livestock, had hidden himself in the cover to prevent the deceased. As such, the fact that the man killed in the murder of Atha was a mother. The maids of the accused alone would not be sufficient to prove that the accused was sufficiently present to appear positively in the prosecution, to identify any defect or defect reached by the trial court for dismissing the ocular account, section 302 / The trial court concluded that the fate of the two accused under 34, PPC did not demand any intervention which was punished under section 304. , Part II, PPC did not challenge its sentence under this section, but prayed for reduction of the prison sentence. The court retained the conviction, but reduced the sentence from 10 years to 7 years. went.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
