Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB versus KHALID AHMAD KHAN

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 Appeal to the Administration of Justice was only Rs 15,000 in the Supreme Court, the decision passed in favor of the respondents was based on the principles of justice. Appellant (provincial government) seems to have already spent a lot more than paying the state treasury for respondents / executors, because of the costs on litigation involving both attorneys paying fees. Including those who appeared in the Supreme Court instead. In this case, where justice was sufficiently fair, the appellants (the provincial government) chose to spend too much on litigation to pay the respondents Rs 15,000 as judgment debt. However, the decision was taken in favor of legal point of view. Regarding appeals in the interest of justice, the Supreme Court does not want to place any heavy burden on the state exchequer. It really cost a lot of money, and it wasn't even known how much the appellant (provincial government) would have to spend if the trial started anew and reached its logical end. The leave order was withdrawn and the matter was settled accordingly Pakistan, top advocate family court from Chak Sheza lawyer