Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS versus SHAFQAT SHAH


Sections 162 and 163 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Customs Officers raided the premises of the respondents and seized some articles even though the officers had no warrants to search and they were not hidden and instead of ordinary. The tires were open where they were visible. The High Court allowed the defendant's constitutional request on the ground that the raid was conducted without a search warrant and that a search warrant was required from the magistrate under Sections 62 and 163 of the Customs Act, 1969, to search for any goods before it. Can be The seized Supreme Court held that interference, like the case, in this case, would not justify involvement in the matter and the issuance of a writ by the High Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Shahpur Chakar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.