The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 307 defined the evidence as the recovery of the stained knife in which the victim was killed, it was alleged that two witnesses were also witnesses, but none of the other witnesses recovered. That was presented by the prosecution after the prosecution proved sufficient to recover the theft, the second witness's non-prosecution was not fatal in the prosecution case especially when the witness presented by the prosecution had any previous rivalry with the accused. And he allegedly contradicted the suspect regarding the number of injuries listed in the FIR There was no reason to. The post-mortem report, which was fully explained, will not adversely affect the prosecution's case. The jurisdiction was assigned to the plaintiff's confrontation with the prosecution's witness and the downfall, but the deceased, the accompanying accomplice, was acquitted. In connection with the incident, it was alleged that he was the only one who had accused Lal Malika. Suspicion was taken advantage of for such an innocent character and his partner was acquitted The accused had not yet been grounded for picking holes in the prosecutor's story until the accused was charged with murder. belongs to. Controversy is that the acquittal of the co-accused had the necessary effect of falsifying the whole story of the prosecutor, the prosecution was overturned and he was sufficiently successful to prove the accused's guilt. Regardless of any doubts, the trial court rightly sentenced the accused and sentenced them on both charges.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
