Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MANNAN versus STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 402B & 307/109 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Appreciating Section 13E Evidence All witnesses unequivocally confirmed that the accused had fired the pistol and that all such witnesses Confirmed the aircraft was on its cockpit. Despite lengthy scrutiny in connection with the plane's attempt to hijack, there was no breakdown and prosecution witnesses had no enmity with the suspect nor were they unnecessarily involved in the alleged crime. The prosecution's witnesses were free, credible and natural, and thus their statement is relevant. In the light of the attendance, the incident was quite credible and with the medical evidence establishing the utility of pistol wounds by the accused on the plane's security guard, only extraordinary relationships with some people, illegal. Could not justify action to move without a license. The pistol in the plane was therefore responsible for the commission of the crime of abducting the e-plane. list of supreme court advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer