Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE

As part of the Complaint for Defamation of Evidence Section 151 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption (XLV of 1860) Section 161 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1919, the prosecutor's witness examined the version given by him in the FIR The length was examined, but no false motive was suggested. The involvement of the accused magistrate, who oversees both the raid and the Circle Officer, provided detailed accounts of both incidents as prosecutors' witnesses, though he admitted that he had not heard the conversation nor seen any money change. However, they have been found to have seized currency notes from their possession. In the statement of the first informant, the statements of both the magistrate and the Circle Officer were taken seriously to the extent of the recovery of defaulted currency notes, the accused was charged, the accused was punished unjustly. when you need a advocate from Shadiwal lawyer