SHAFFAQAT ALI MULLAH ALIAS JUJ versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 399 Preparation for Conviction of Robbery Evidence, The accused charged with not appreciating direct or indirect evidence was preparing or preparing, and this was a pretext of the dacoity and someone else. There was no crime, the subsequent arrest of properly armed suspects could not have led to the fact that they were preparing to commit a crime, and the robber who informed the police that the accused was preparing to commit robbery. Evidence of prosecution was not presented against them. The suspects were traveling with them in a firearm vehicle, for which the accused was charged and tried separately, except for unacceptable evidence from a prosecution witness. There is nothing in the record in the evidence of the allegations that it is likely that the accused had weapons for any other purpose. Cannot be excluded from committing robbery. The arson, kept under fire, will not be brought under the purview of section 999999 of the PPC, in which case the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer
