A. RASHID RIZWANI versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF
The Transfer Property Act 1882 Section 105 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 petitioner held that it had carried out the formal rent for a period of two years in relation to the plot in the dispute and for a fixed period. Had paid the rent for, but the Respondent did not accept the status of the rental process, if the payment of rent for a particular period does not constitute tenancy for a fixed term then one of the last payment of rent. After the expiry of the month, the applicant was seized by the respondents, After the expiration of the two-year period. This is reportedly could not find the maintenance of land based on the monthly rent. The question poses is that the residents of the neighborhood have been leased for use as a children's amusement park, the interest of the respondents should be given priority over the interests of the individual, especially when the person leasing The rights holder was not shown. The High Court's intervention in exercising extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction in F, which was primarily arbitrary jurisdiction, was not approved.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Buchay Key lawyer