MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus GHULAM MUSTAFA
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Sections 13 (3) (a) (ii) and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 require personal constitutional jurisdiction, practice of the tenant against which removal orders Was simultaneously approved by two courts below, claiming that during the eviction petition, the landlord emptied two shops in the same building, but the same landlord did not occupy During the request for eviction against the tenant, only one shop was vacant, but explained that the store was empty. The other tenant was not fit for his needs by this and that the two shops in the tenant's possession were more suitable for his needs because they were adjoining the house and the house in which the landlord lived. No conclusions can be drawn with the conclusions recorded by. Below are about the shops that suit the homeowner's needs
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Bat Khela lawyer