GHULAM HUSSAIN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
Article 10 (3) of the West Pakistan Stabilization Holding Ordinance, 1960 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Proceedings of Constitutional Jurisdiction, the practice of collector on the basis of a compromise between the parties, proceeded to pass the order with some amendments. And the order collector of this approval alleged by the Board of Revenue Petitioner that he had never compromised with the respondents at any stage of the litigation, approved by the authorities below. The previous coordination orders did not show any doubt as to the division of land between the parties. Compromise is. Such facts between the landowners cannot be interfered with by the High Court in the process of constitutional jurisdiction when accessed through authorized forums, especially when the petitioner also failed to state what injustice was done to him. And what were the orders of the authorized forums. Only, appropriate and approved according to law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer