Articles 5, 9 and 11 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 (1973), Article 199 for the dissolution of marriage mentioned in the schedule of witnesses filed with the plaintiff and his father, whose names were filed by the plaintiff in their written statement. Was brought to the court when the case was called, even if the trial court held that there was no justification to postpone further hearing of the case, the statements of the defendant and his father were sent to the Family Court. Should have been recorded in which he failed to do so, the judgment and decree were approved. Subject to judicial judgment and constitutional jurisdiction, after rejecting the judicial verdict and injunction, allowing the defendant to present his evidence, the trial court's decision was presented without legal proceedings without legal authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
