Find a Lawyer

SAEEDA PARVEEN versus SAEEDA SHEIKH

Civil Procedure Code CPCVVII of the CPC Summary Procedure for the Debt Receipt on the basis of Section 96, OXXVII, RR2 and 3 suits, on note negotiating device and The alleged pro note for defense was fake, fabricated, false and deliberate and said the pro note was unacceptable because it was never presented to the defendant by the plaintiff, the court observed. Whether the defendants failed to raise any substantive questions about the law and the fact, and the defense presented by the defendant was merely an argument but the defendants Not only was the question presented by the CBI a substantial question but also the other question that needed to be considered was whether the trial filed by the trial court after almost 7 years after the execution of the alleged pro note. There was a failure notice. Such important questions denied the defendant's permission to appear and defend his order as plaintiff ary and unlawful best law firm from Thari Mirwah lawyer