DAWOOD HERCULES CHEMICALS LIMITED versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
Applicants trademark ub bar tiger lion on behalf of the Registrar Articles 6 and 76 of the Trademarks Act, 1940, refusing to register the lion's device, on the basis that the trademark has been declared normal for trade. Is common to trade and although attached to a particular commodity cannot be deemed to be distinguishable, or may not be deemed to be distinguishable from the purpose of section 6, the Trademarks Act of 1940, When such a trademark was used in conjunction with another specific word or feature or device, he said that the applicant N's goods can be trademarked as marking others as though the lion's device was termed common for trade, but nevertheless, lion tiger's words combined with the words The lion's device is a similar one and produced an image that was different from the ordinary lion's trademark. Ubber tiger reg was so regressive. The case was remanded to the registrar.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer
