Find a Lawyer

KARAM HUSSAIN SHAH versus HASIL

Paragraph 25 (3) (d) of the Martial Law Regulation 1972, section 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (1913), for the purpose of taking part in the tenancy-based ownership of the land in question, and also of the plaintiffs of Wendy as co-owner. There were partners in the land. Question Wonders are entitled to take possession of the land on the basis of the defendants, even if they were available. The history of the sale of land in this question is 249 1971, the defendants of the shopkeepers had no right to pre-occupation in the history of the secured vendies, however, the owners of the land in the suit in the history of the suit also the vendes. The owners were the shareholders in the land. The question is, they cannot claim any rights as tenants because merging tenants 'rights to property rights will relieve their tenants' rights, thus, before the umpires. Could not defeat the case that they were underground land in the date of sale property advocate from Ambela lawyer