MUSHTAQ AHMED versus THE STATE
Testimonies 302/307/148 and 149 Testimonies of testimony The eye witnesses attributed each individual to a specific individual, but it was not possible to believe, given the number of accused, that the eyewitnesses witnessed the incident, therefore defending it. The version, as given by the accused, was denied by the courts, but the reasons given by the High Court for acquittal of the two accused were equally applicable in the case of the accused who were convicted, the prosecution said. Keeping the case in line with the defense version, the court had to take the decision in favor of the accused against the convicted accused. Also not free from doubt, the Supreme Court has the benefit of the doubt and ordered his acquittal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Lala rukh lawyer