MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus THE STATE
Prohibited (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 103 Recovery Police Officer obtains spy information on sale of drugs in the heart of the city but does not take any private person) Worked as a consultant to any such endeavor. The recovery site was also a public place, but the police officer said in cross-examination that he did not feel it necessary to call any witnesses from the public. Another such witness of the police officer was confirmed. Usually people were involved in the investigation. But the police officer was not summoned in the present case; public evidence regarding the weight of heroin was also requested by the contempt court, which was stated in the affidavit. The suspects were acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kamra lawyer
