Find a Lawyer

NASREEN MAHMOODA versus MUMTAZ IMRAN

The first appellate court of the OXXII, R3 and Section 115 review jurisdiction found that the transfer of the plaintiff's request for the appointment of the parents of the minor defendants was not supported by the previous order of affidavit and appointment. Was done Such defendants, even after entering into evidence in the affidavits of the plaintiffs, had given technical consideration to the matter, the first appellate court having passed such an order without exercising its judicial mind that, in fact, the minors There was no prejudice. In the order of this case, his defense case was mechanically misconstrued that all proceedings prior to the appointment of a guardian ad were foiled, under which the law for deciding an appeal Failed to comply with 's jurisdiction. Oh Merit, because, the legal proceedings were not affected in any way because there was no reason for prejudice in the slightest, the defendants were fully monitored in their interests, who were their natural guardians. He was eventually appointed as the guardian of the guard, who had previously been looking after the interests of minors, thus rendering a remand order by the First Appellate Court at any stage of the suit. And the case was remanded to settle the appeal on merit. law firms from Killa Saifullah lawyer