Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR ALI versus ASGHAR ALI

Two of the three plaintiffs and their attorneys, as described during the trial, for the specific performance of the section 12 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 12 suit land sale, 1873 The special took the oath, on the Qur'an, to the conclusion that he did not sign the thumb or thumb in relation to the contract, nor did he receive any money in connection with the deal, on the dismissal of his case. There will be no objection. The defendants accepted the offer of the two plaintiffs and submitted the report by the local commissioner, which was read by the parties who had not raised any objection to it and accordingly the defendants of the trial proceeded on behalf of the High Court. The appeal dismissed that the defendant had committed fraud. In securing the judgment in their favor, the trial court and, therefore, the judgment passed by the trial court and the judgment were entitled to be rejected by the plaintiff's arguments. The case, which was for the distribution of the land, including the land involved in the dispute, the defendant admitted in acknowledging the receipt of some money, therefore, he lied during the oath that he had not paid anything. had gone. In connection with the dispute agreement, the appellant / plaintiff took the first decision in connection with the adjudication of the case on a special oath, apparently when they made the offer on their behalf even though they knew that they said The applicants acknowledged the receipt of a certain amount, and despite all of this, they offered to resolve the dispute on the basis of the special oath they offered, the respondent readily accepted their offer. And it's hard to say ask a advocate free from Timergara lawyer