Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE

The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 308 and 304 (1), the testimony of eyewitnesses was not only closely related to the accused, but it also seemed to have provided evidence with a motive other than to tell the truth, of which one accused. There were serious injuries, one of which was that the springs were not properly described with sharp weapons and naturally traumatic events. The facts of the injuries suffered by eyewitnesses proved that the deceased party was speeding. Was equipped with heavy weapons as well as two-shot weapons. The rape accused was also intended to attack people. Witnesses were primarily unreliable witnesses, who were not convinced to the extent of the presence of some suspects that the accused was stained with blood four days from his house. Recovery theft was a natural possibility case trial. The court, thus, failed to define the case and the evidence on record as per the guidelines given y the superior courts for defining evidence in cases in which the conviction or sentence of the offenders was kept separate and He was acquitted in the case. patent advocate from Sakrand lawyer