Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus ABDUL HAKIM

Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act 1958 Sections 10 & 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 When the record shows that the respondents had acquired more land than they had, the realistic dispute was whether there was any There was no fraud or misrepresentation. It does not matter if a claim is made to a claimant with uncontested PI units in the same case who, after obtaining his entitlement, receives additional land or wishes to retain the land acquired beyond the privilege. If so, she would prefer both. In law and in the disputed information and claimants to the satisfaction of their deserving PI units will be entitled to use the land in order to give priority to areas retaining more area than their entitled High Court, therefore, it should be constitutionally. Should not have used their discretion. Jurisdiction for Respondents us immigration advocates from Ziarat lawyer