Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD LINE SUPERINTENDENT-I versus WAPDA

West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958 Section 17 (1A) Forced Retirement WAPDA employee was caught red-handed accepting illegal pleasure during a raid on the orders of a clerk of his own department when a magistrate supervised it. And monitored it. However, as far as the conduct of the magistrate was concerned, any other weakness was taken, however, instead of a straightforward trial for a clear offense, WAPDA officials allegedly accepted the conditions for illegal confession. An inquiry committee has been formed to investigate. As a result of the employee and committee action, he was issued a show cause notice accusing him of bribery / misconduct, to which he responded and submitted affidavits of five WAPDA employees and two private persons. Who, according to him, was present in the aforementioned proceedings which led to the permission, if at all he needed, to accuse Siri of trying to save the accused so far. I was stopped by the attitude of the concerned top officials because the question of prosecution for the most heinous crime was dealt with by the Supreme Court. Oops, the Supreme Court observed that if such things are happening in every case. Bribery, attempted to be established through raid evidence, especially by the magistrate, would make the position of magistrate extremely dangerous, and in this case the ordinary rustic citizen would be justified in thinking that the magistrate was probably an unscrupulous person. That is why the accused was not allowed to prosecute such a magistrate, not indirectly in any system of law. list of advocates from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer