Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ZOHRA versus THE STATE

Section 302/307/366/376/452 & 149 Two separate incidents occurred by two sets of accused persons at two separate places In one incident the victim was killed in his house and there was a set of accused. Had abused. Other relatives of the deceased attacked and injured the second set of suspects, the trial court convicted the first set of accused under Sections 302/452/366 and 376, PPC while the second set of suspects. Under Sections 730 & 9149, the PPC Complainant submitted that the two accused had committed the murder of the victim in a joint intention to have the same object and achieve this purpose. In doing so, some of the accused went to the victim's house while others went to the cattle. There was no evidence to show conspiracy between the two sets of suspects as they excused and injured the victim's relatives. When they attacked two different places, the accused left the victims of cattle sheds. The assailants did not go to the house of the Iranian victim and participated in the killing of the accused. The trial court's finding was rightly agreed that the two defendants were separately liable for the crimes committed because no one was on file to prove the community's intentions among the defendants involved in these events. There was no evidence, in a shed containing livestock and other livestock, that the deceased's relatives were attacked at various locations under Section 2302, PPC. best law firms from Digri lawyer