FAISAL RASHID versus THE STATE
Sections 395, 397 and 307 of the law (Article 10 of 1984), Article 22 Identification of the incident occurred during the daylight and there was a quarrel between the accused and the witness of the witness, there was no enmity with the witnesses and they proved false evidence. There was no reason to do that. The witnesses were straightforward, natural and trustworthy without any doubt that the same section MG was recovered from the suspect who was taken from the witnesses The accused were correctly identified by the prosecution witnesses in the incidents [Identification].
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Kalaswala lawyer
