GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
The appearance and non-appearance of the CPC of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in O IX, R 6 [as amended in the Law of Ordinance (XII of 1972)] forcing the courts to approve the former party The order may be passed without having to record evidence. , Applications must be filed on oath or solemn affirmation. Nevertheless, the High Courts looked at the orders made against absentees irrespective of the ever-present records or the application of the mind, in fact amended O IX, R 6, CPC any arbitrary authority or contempt. Messenger does not provide. The spirit of the law requires that whenever the trial court deems it not necessary to examine the evidence, the reasons for justifying the decision of the claim should be recorded without further action, while the trial court, while passing the previous order, No decision. The reference to any part of the evidence, and the mere absence of judgment against the applicant, was decided only because of his absence the petitioner had no such legal permission, and was expressly exempt from legal authority. was not
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
