ASMATULLAH versus AMANULLAH KHAN
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) directs tenants to evict tenants for a personal need of a house Was based on The High Court upheld its finding in the appeal. Originally the father of the existing landlord owned the property and gave it to the tenant after the death of the original landlord, the existing landlord became the owner of the property and a new lease was executed by a person. The landlord has a legal claim in favor of the tenant claiming that there was a private settlement between the legal heirs, according to which the landlord came to the part of the landlord who had leased it in his favor. That the other co-owner could not bring the removal request and. As the premises were exclusively owned by a landlord, it could not be vacated for the needs of another co-owner / landlord, there was no evidence that the landlord's private settlement and his specialty Property that the lease executed. Being joint owners All landlords being joint owners, it was appropriate for any of the landlords to maintain a personal need application, and no misrepresentation was identified, appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Khair Pur Mir lawyer