FAIZ ELAHI versus SHAMIR
Government Land Colonial Law (Punjab) Act 1912 Section 19 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 53A Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 100 Aggregate Colony Land 1 of 1958 Amount to acquire property rights on the contract. deposit. The sale was executed by the plaintiff in favor of the appellant on 11 19 1963, while the decision to consent in favor of the appellant was adopted on 21 6 1965 after the respondents dismissed the case for contesting such order. Was made but his appeal was accepted by the first appellate court, the value of the land was collected in 1958 and after proving such fact through irrefutable evidence, the defendant was paid the required price. Time became its absolute owner and its title was not postponed to receive the contract, after which the respondents hanged it. It deposited money for the acquisition of proprietary rights, such agreement did not require the collector's consent under section 19 of the Act V of 1912, which was applicable only if the cable was kept in government. And whether to exchange the tenancy rights of such land, and the decision of the court and the first appellate court, rejecting the decision on the basis that the consent of the collector was essentially based on misrepresentation and misuse of evidence. The trial court's decision was reinstated and the first appellate court set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Barkhan lawyer