Find a Lawyer

RAHIM BUX JAMALI, M.PA. versus STATE

The Conan e-evidence Order 1984 Article 38 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/201/34, the definition of evidence was not admissible in the evidence of the driver of the accused in the form of his statement before the police and his judicial confession and Such statements against the accused and the driver's judicial confession were recorded while he was in custody and he was named a co-accused in the trial, which is a judicial confession of self-driving and as a statement of the prosecution's witness. Was not recorded on. Do not use against another person property advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer