LAL DEENO versus THE STATE
Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975 Section 4 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 216A, 365, 392 and 411 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX 1965), Section 13A, 216A, Under 365, special court offenses are authorized. & 411, PPC, which was charged that they were not `` scheduled offenses, '' but a Presiding Officer of the Special Court, who filed such an opinion under section 4 of the Special Courts Act, 1975 and only such offenses. Was charged with prosecuting the accused. Those who had fixed offenses, without the necessary requirements of the law, not only failed to record their opinion accordingly, but were also charged, prosecuted and sentenced for those offenses under which the schedule was not a crime. , The presiding officer prosecuted one of the defendants twice under Section 13A. The Presiding Officer of the Arms Ordinance, 1965, the whole proceeding conducted by the special court was illegal and without any jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kandhkot lawyer
