Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus ABDULLAH

Appearance and Disappearance of Parties to CPC Civil Procedure Code Order IX O IX, R 6 (1) (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Approved by Court on Trial In addition to the aforesaid High Court affirming the previous partial order against the defendant, the trial court also directed the jail authorities, despite the information regarding the defendant's detention, to present it on a fixed date when The previous party decree against was passed when the plaintiff was convicted of a criminal charge, so it was absent that the defendant had no proceedings for the due date. Was, against the previous proceedings can not, by the plaintiff plaintiff was not present before the son of the defendant on the date specified, the plaintiff lawyer's court case 4 is not formed. After the defendant's detention was reported by his minor son on a criminal charge, he was obliged to continue a process of trial against the defendant, exercising his jurisdiction. Was made illegally and against the provisions of the appellate court, an ion court did not consider the facts of the case. The former party docket and the ex parte order were set aside and the trial proceeded according to law. Was sent to the trial court. top advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer