ADIL AHMED versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE
Applicant appeals and revises against the confiscation of four-seizure vehicle seizure of Articles 85 (f) and 156 of the Customs Act 1969, Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 for possession of vehicles. The constitutional petitioner requested the minor to serve his minority and showcases notice that the applicant pays the driver of the vehicle through the applicant, therefore, because of the commission or error on his assigned vehicle, he is not guilty. Was responsible. The driver who questioned that he was arrested on 18 10 1988, was transferred in the name of the same applicant in 1988, the fact itself revealed whether the applicant's mains were Ray. Its agent constitutional petition cannot be executed against the jurisdiction of the Administrative Tribunals. The leave to appeal in the case was denied on the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
