ZULFIQAR versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 193 and 200 accused applied for bail before arrest in which the prosecution witness and the allegedly kidnapped boy were presented with their affidavits to prove that there was a compromise between the parties. It happened that when these people were questioned about their affidavit, they took the affidavit wrong and wrong and it is alleged that their thumb impression was obtained by plaintiffs on plain sheets of papers. And since the contents of the affidavit are not his statements, the allegations of the prosecution witnesses who have put their thumbs on the affidavits The views were acknowledged, the theory cannot be believed, the fact is that they went to court with the accused in the presence of the author of the affidavit and the Oath Commissioner who gave his thumbs-up confirmation. There was no reasonable possibility, so there is no need to suspect that the controversial affidavits were not given by the witnesses or that the false evidence was produced by the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Umer Kot lawyer