Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

Sindh Tenant Rules Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 & 21 In Karachi, the personal need of a landlord for a property, in his evidence, confessed before the court that he was a permanent resident of Punjab where he had property and his son. Were married and were managing land. In Punjab, the landlord also admitted that his wife was living in Punjab and after his retirement he had moved to Punjab and was living there. Further admission was that one of his stores was vacant, he had not started a business in this shop. But rent it. The landlord is eight years old and suffering from joint pain. All such entries indicate that the landlord and his family were settled in Punjab, and as a landlord, he never thought of doing business in Karachi. In order to obtain the eviction of the tenant landlord, the business was raised in question and was not brought to court with clean hands and his stores which he gifted to his sons Landlord. In his eviction request, he claimed he did not own any other shop, he did not refuse to admit in his court that before submitting the eviction request, he moved another shop adjacent to the landlord. Had left. In the landlord's appeal against the cross controller's decision, the claim about the shop's requirements was completely shaken, in which his removal request was dismissed, and he was asked not to intervene. He was dismissed under circumstances. family advocate from Bannu lawyer