RASHID AHMAD versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR (SCHOOLS)
The previous decision of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) Service Tribunal neither the applicant nor his lawyer had presented in the date of hearing despite his service, the petitioner's request was that neither his lawyer be present at the time. The notice was not received, nor was his lawyer absentee deliberately or as such the date of the return of the notice could be justified, however, which was completely established from the record Due time could have been provided for the applicant and the court could have been present that she could not investigate the service prediction. Work was done in front of any tribunal unless the question was raised and the attendance was not given by the tribunal itself to the applicant and his lawyer, as the service tribunal submitted. Appeals must be retained on leave, otherwise no appeal is allowed. The circumstances were denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Zhob lawyer