Find a Lawyer

MASOOD AHMED CHAUDHARI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATION

In the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3), the Appeal Tribunal appealed to the government employees that the service record of the public servant was not satisfactory and hence, they were not considered suitable for promotion of employment. The civil servant did not file. Regarding any supplemental statement that he claims will not have been made a negative comment or that the Public Promotion Committee decides its eligibility, in the absence of such a request from public servants with others, The service tribunal committed any legal wrongdoing; in fact, the civil servant was dismissed for unsatisfactory record and this is a matter of choice and appropriate; the jurisdiction of the service tribunal was not extended. Was a government employee who wanted to create a realistic dispute in appeals for leave He could only lift it before the service. The tribunal did not raise such a request before the service tribunal, there was no forum for Supreme Court E for the first time public servants did not dispute the facts before the service tribunal, finding the publicity committee's finding on the matter appropriate. Must and cannot be replaced by a service tribunal which has been refused appeal. advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer