CHANNO versus GULAB
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff, which is jointly joint venture, the partner initially received a preliminary injunction explaining his entitlement to the joint property, then the final order to the plaintiff. Document under which he was entitled to distribute the shares to his particular shareholders. The appeal was unsuccessful till the leave of the High Court to appeal. The courts below considered all aspects of the case that were not disputed by the plaintiff in favor of the case. In the crucial argument that a plaintiff cannot be finalized with a special measurable number, the final order correctly after the trial court's factual analysis of the facts of the trial court. Was granted, there was no justification for the law to reopen the matter on a dispute of fact, no point in the law was involved, leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer