Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

CHANNO versus GULAB


The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff, which is jointly joint venture, the partner initially received a preliminary injunction explaining his entitlement to the joint property, then the final order to the plaintiff. Document under which he was entitled to distribute the shares to his particular shareholders. The appeal was unsuccessful till the leave of the High Court to appeal. The courts below considered all aspects of the case that were not disputed by the plaintiff in favor of the case. In the crucial argument that a plaintiff cannot be finalized with a special measurable number, the final order correctly after the trial court's factual analysis of the facts of the trial court. Was granted, there was no justification for the law to reopen the matter on a dispute of fact, no point in the law was involved, leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.