Find a Lawyer

KARIM BAKHSH versus DISTRICT JUDGE

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) After the applicant had recorded the evidence of all the evidence presented by him on the date of adjournment, requested further evidence which he considered was the most important to prove his case. Was important, but eventually his application was dismissed The court was obliged to give him time to present further evidence, but he failed to cite any law clause in support of his dispute, if the witness who requested the petitioner If it was so important, then it should have been checked beforehand. At the last minute, nothing was found wrong in the inadmissible order; the request was dismissed property advocate from Kohlu lawyer