TALIB HUSSAIN versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), although the applicant was not found to be directly linked to the preparation of the fraudulent and fraudulent result card, was not entitled to arbitrary relief against the applicants through two courts. The appellant and the reviewing courts did not suffer any weaknesses in seeking the facts presented, even though the fraudulent and fraudulent result was not directly linked to the preparation of the card, yet to use it to their advantage. No one else could have benefited from the fraud and the fraudulently attempted fraud. Petitioner could not be detected, therefore, the result could not be relieved of his responsibility for his non-cooperation with the card maker, no justification was given to prevent the finding of factual concordance. Which was otherwise unimaginable. The applicant attempted to use a forged and fraudulent result card to his advantage that he would lose any arbitrary relief through a grant. Leave to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Malakwal lawyer