MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Requires Houses for the Personal Needs of the Landlord by the House Witnesses that one or two shops belonging to the landlord were vacant. ? His own evidence stated that the underwear shop was located in front of the market while other stores were empty, therefore, not suitable for the general store business that his son intended to set up in the shop in question. Choosing any of your own shops for the purpose of owning a possession and being such a proper rental controller and appellate court judge was the best one that took notice of a landlord's request for tenancy from other landlords And was outlawed. They did not face any illegal and arbitrary plea to interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction, and Ion was dismissed in favor of coordinating the facts of the Rent Controller and Appellate Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
