SARFUDDIN CHUGHTAI versus SETTLEMENT DEPARTMENT
Use of the effects of property allotments under Section 10 Constitutional Property and Homelessness Act (repealed) Act (XIV of 1975), Section 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction, Applicant's Questions, And such an allotment was finalized. In the favor of the respondents, such allocation was an act of illegal applicant, even though the notified officer did not get effective relief on his request after the withdrawal rules were removed, but the fact of the matter was that the respondents The request cannot be construed as denying constitutional jurisdiction. The applicant's refusal to exercise constitutional jurisdiction on behalf of the applicants, in this case, constitutes unlawful conduct by the Settlement Authority and an act of misconduct that cannot be ordered for property allotment in favor of the respondents. ? It was declared intact and without any legal authority nor any legal effect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Hattian lawyer