AMJAD HUSSAIN versus QAISER SIDDIQUE
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 In default of payment of rent, the tenant applied to submit the rent from 21 January 1986 to January 1986 to April 1986, however, at the request of the tenants. Decided on May 29, 1986, after issuing a notice to the landlord, all the rent was submitted on June 2, 1986, the tenancy between the parties was canceled in March, rent was canceled on March 31, 1986, and payment was made in June. May be months of. According to the provisions of section 13 (2) (d) in 1986, the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, which the tenant applied for before paying rent, could not be considered as default rent. ? The tenant cannot be held liable for any delay in the request of the tenant and lack of timely submission of the controller. No one can be subjected to prejudice by any act or the court was not legally entitled to reject the tenant. His application for rent submission was decided on the same day where, for some regulatory reasons, the decision to apply for a rent for a tenant was later decided and submitted shortly afterwards. That should be related to the same date with all justice. This type of request was not fixed in the payment of rent, so can be attributed to the tenant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Swat lawyer