NIAZ AHMAD versus ISHTIAQ AHMAD
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 and 15 In the payment of rent the arbitrary scope of the default rental landlord was obtained for one year and the tenant due to such exercise. You can get a very good impression. The lower appellate court finding can be paid for the same amount of money that was proved wrong in the payment of rent from a predetermined period, the rent controller was given the option not to pay. Refuse to approve the withdrawal order. Rental was established There was no willful default in the payment of rent, discretion should be exercised in favor of the tenant which was used correctly and legally by the rent controller. Could not be interfered with because it was neither arbitrary nor illegal. In the appeal, the default tenant was not legally justified in finding that the lower appellate court's finding about deferment was the total amount set aside for the payment of rent while the High Court had appointed the rent controller. Was restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Qazi Ahmed lawyer