Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOOR JEHAN versus NAZIR AHMAD KHAN


On the basis of section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the Schedule to Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the suit states that the wife was present as a witness on the basis of giving up the dower's money. The first example is that he abandoned the device and in the same breath he said that he would never give up his door money, family court has not considered such pieces of evidence which This means that the court does not consider the material available on the material evidence. In its proper context, the court also ignored the record wife's statement and the terms and conditions of the divorce, which resulted in severe injustice to the wife, on the basis of the evidence at the trial, after the verdict. Referred to Family Court. Its qualities

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.