Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR MALIK versus IMTIAZ KHALIQ MALIK

The Punjab Local Councils (Election) Rules 1979 R15 (3) (ii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 rejected the nomination papers for selection of nomination paper, on the basis that the applicant was rejected. Father Father's name was mentioned in the father's electoral list, instead the \ marshaar nomination appellate authority retained the order to reject the papers or allowed the applicant's father's name to be mistaken. Could go The resolution, as it relates to the details of the candidate, as stated in the Punjab Local Council (Election) Rules, R15 (3) of 1979, states that the objection against the applicant's father was of a mechanical nature and in a written objection, It is not stated that the petitioner was not the one who was selected on the relevant serial number in the electoral roll, if the returning officer had conducted a summary inquiry as per R15 (3), Punjab Local Council (Election) Rules. 1979, HE can only conclude that the rejection of the nomination paper is in relation to the father of the nomination on the basis of such error or defect. Rules of provisions were deleted by mistake or defect in the third section. He was not named in the selection list, he did not demand his papers to be rejected, so the applicant is considered as a legitimate nominee to participate in the election. online advocate from Guddu lawyer