Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ AHMAD MUFTI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Pro-Pharma Promotion Departmental Promotion Committee, ignored the respondent public servant twice and refused to be promoted as a result of inquiry against him and imposed minor penalties. Was eventually promoted, but their representation for pro-pharma promotion was rejected by the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction stating that department officials had been instructed to present the matter to a publicity board - the plaintiff. Short of the employee's intervention, he withheld the right of the High Court. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court cited certain government policy areas under which the defendant public servant's publicity case was considered, but High he was not illegally overlooked by the High Court observations. It was neither his nor his own to predict the proceedings before the selection board. Impact of their decision n In one way or another the High Court did not comment on leave to appeal the defendant's sanity case. best advocate from Sakardu lawyer