ZIAUL HAQ versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
Assignment of Selection of Seniority by the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Public Service Commission When the basis of appointment was chosen by the Public Service Commission, the seniority assigned by the Public Service Commission could not be stopped or The government had no right other than that. Substituting and reporting to the Public Service Commission so as to deviate from the recommendations of the Public Service Commission, the decision of the Government / Department of Public Service Commission Service Tribunal regarding the selection and merit of both select committees is not a choice. Can do. From the date of his joining, the selected seniors did not conform to the seniority assignment of the Public Service Commission and failed to take notice that the Public Service Commission had selected the candidates and assigned them the seniority. There was no fixed timeline for participation in any of the polls. Failure to join, another reference had to go crazy The Public Service Commission was given no such reference by the department to replace him, though dates were given for inclusion in that appointment. There was only a directory and there was no need to cancel a self-selection or seniority service tribunal decision. On the contrary, the decision of the Sustainable Service Tribunal was not decided and seniority was instructed to assign selectors on the basis of the Public Service Commission's seniority assignment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer