Find a Lawyer

JAN MUHAMMAD versus ABDUL GHAFFAR

Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (ii) (v) and 21 (1) The default and annoying documents prepared by the appellant / landlord, neither regularly exhibited nor rented. The exhibit was denied by the controller of the same, as well as the evidence that which aspect of the respondents / tenant wit locked in relation to their personal affidavit left the required action, authorized by the rent controller. The procedure did not appear to be legal, though an appeal filed by the landlord against the rent controller order requesting eviction was first The landlord could not have been successful on the basis of default and hassle, but in view of the fact that the order passed by the Rent Controller appealed to him, he was not free from material defects, the High Court appealed. It should be re-decided according to the allowed and remanded case. After the parties were allowed to present testimony, a tender was already submitted to the law for necessary and proper investigation. immigration advocates email from Rashidabad lawyer